Pit bulls should be legal to own as pets

Essay must contain 2 quotes. My argument: I am agreeing with it being legal to own a pit bull. I have attached the outline that I want you to use it, but please do not copy it word for word because I have not written it superbly. Rather rewrite it in your words and improve it based on instructions.

Make sure introduction and conclusion are both great.

Each paragraph needs to begin with a topic sentence.

Each paragraph is 5-7 sentences.



Pit bulls have for the longest time been classified as violent and dangerous dogs. Interestingly, this classification has been used to collectively describe several dog breeds including the Staffordshire bull terrier and the American Pit Bull Terrier. The aim of this analysis is to debunk the myth that pit bulls pose a real danger to the community. This myth has continued to prevail despite the fact that pit bulls have become the most common and friendly pets across America. As noted in, “there are many modern-day pit bull heroes, such as drug sniffing dogs, as well as pit bulls that act as therapy dogs by comforting the grieving and the sick”. For this reason, it is contradicting to find that the same dogs that are considered dangerous to humans are also the most widely preferred. Based on the analysis provided here, pit bulls are being unjustly vilified, and calls to illegalize it are based merely on myths as opposed to facts and statistics.


Facts Versus Myths

One of the common myths about pit bulls arises from the argument that they have a locking jaw and do not let go once they bite. It is also widely considered extremely dangerous to rescue someone from their grasp especially without knowledge of the dog’s history. These claims notwithstanding, there is an estimated 10-15 million pit bulls in American households (Arluke, 78). Based on these statistics and the myths, one would expect to receive reports of thousands of fatal attacks attributed to this type of dog each year, which is not the case. A second supporting fact is that pit bulls have continuously passed the temperament test at a high rate.

Local authorities across America use the Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) to ban specific dog breeds that are considered a threat (Smith 112). As an example, Denver has banned pit bulls. The legislation that bans their rearing is based on the idea that pit bulls that have been abused or taught how to fight viciously cannot be rehabilitated and considered safe enough to have as a pet.

Nevertheless, the Michael Vick Dogs case study has already disproved this theory (Arluke 98). Out of an initial 47 dogs that were captured in this study, 25 were able to go to shelters where they would be safely placed with families. The remaining 22 were considered vicious and extremely dangerous (Arluke 102). They were taken to Best Friends Animal Sanctuary, a center which specializes in dogs that have had abusive and difficult pasts. During this period, a representative testified that these dogs could not be rehabilitated and this only left researchers with the option of euthanization.

Determined to prove this theory wrong, the researchers continued to engage the dogs in a friendly and professional form of rehabilitation. Eventually, most of them were made into therapy animals and others were taken by families as pets. Only two remained in the shelter and could not be placed since they did not fully pass the safety tests. Even so, the dogs were notably friendly compared to when they were initially brought in. these findings debunked the myth that pit bulls are extremely dangerous dogs that cannot be kept as pets.


The banning of pit bulls appears to be an unjustified and discriminatory move. Places such as Denver that have banned this dog have not banned other ferocious dogs such as the Labrador which has shown more verifiable cases of threat and human attacks. The BSL is therefore essentially ineffective and has been used to punish an entire breed that may be unjustly vilified while the real threat goes undetected and unregulated. Therefore, it is unfair to ban this dog on basis of myths and hearsay as opposed to facts and proven statistics. In truth, the Pit bull does not appear to be as much of a threat as it has recently been portrayed to be. In the words of Abraham Lincoln, “I am in favor of Animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being.” An excellent way to echo the sentiments of the country’s founding father is to preserve the rights of animals, particularly pit bulls.

Works Cited

Arluke, Arnold. Just a Dog: Understanding Animal Cruelty and Ourselves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 2006. Print. Should Pit Bulls be Banned? October 17, 2016. Web.

Smith, Kimberly. Governing Animals: Animal Welfare and the Liberal State. New York: Oxford University Press. 2012. Print.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :