constitutional rights of privacy

The case pits constitutional rights of privacy and protection from unfair police tactics against high-tech government surveillance. In my opinion, since police are already free to conduct surveillance by simply following someone, I don’t see a difference between trailing someone by car, on foot, or using technology. In effect, they all do the same thing and produce the same outcome don’t they? I would have ruled in favor of upholding the information gathered by the FBI to be used in the case. The world we live in now is different and I feel that government and law enforcement agencies should be able to use different types of technology at hand without warrant. I understand that everyone is entitled to their privacy, but If you don’t have anything to hide, I really don’t see what the problem is if it makes the world a safer place.

apply to these post 2-3 sentences. agree or disagree