Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric (see below). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments.
- This assignment requires that support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly (peer reviewed journal articles count) resources (within the last 5 years). At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
- You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
This assignment comprises the third and final part of a multi-section assignment (see uploaded file for previous work. Reading the previous work is necessary to complete this part of the paper.) For this final part Write a 2,000-2,500 word paper that provides the following:
- Identify a public health theory you will use to support the hypothetical implementation of your prevention and health promotion activities. Provide evidence that supports the use of this theory within the program you designed.
- Design evidenced-based prevention and health promotion activities that could be implemented to decrease the health risk among your previously identified population (see previous work for identified population).
- Identify the evaluation program you will use to determine the efficacy of your health promotion activities and in meeting the expected outcomes.
Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation Grading Rubric
Less than Satisfactory
|5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly Paper||Learner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated.||N/A||Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papers.||Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers.||earner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper.|
|10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations||None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present.||Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related.||All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable.||All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources.||All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.|
|15.0 %Identifies the Public Health/Health Promotion Theory That Was Used to Develop Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Provides Rationale for Why This Theory Was Used||Paper does not identify a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities.||Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper does not provide rationale for why the theory was used.||Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Rationale for why the theory was used is weak or inconclusive.||Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides good rationale for why the theory was used.||Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides strong and insightful rationale for why the theory was used.|
|20.0 %Provides Design and Projected Implementation of Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Program Is Appropriate for Identified Population||Paper does not provide design or projected implementation for health prevention and promotion activities; or, program is inappropriate for identified population.||Paper provides basic design for health prevention and promotion activities, but does not include projections for implementation. Program does not directly relate to the identified population.||Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes an outline for projected implementation. Program is sufficient for identified population.||Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes projection for implementation. Program is appropriate for identified population.||Paper provides well thought out design for health prevention and promotion activities. Projection for implementation uses foresight and includes significant detail. Program is well thought out and appropriate for identified population.|
|20.0 %Program Evaluation to Determine Efficacy (Aligns Public Health Components Essential to Nursing Science; Demonstrates How These Components Are Essential to Effect Improvement on Population Health)||Paper does not establish alignment of public health components essential to nursing science.||Attempts to align public health components essential to nursing science, but does not demonstrate how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health.||Paper aligns some of the public health components essential to nursing science and generally demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health.||Paper aligns public health components essential to nursing science and demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health.||Paper establishes a clear and strong alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. Demonstration of how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health is insightful and well supported.|
|20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness|
|7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose||Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.||Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.||Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.||Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.||Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.|
|20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness|
|8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction||Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.||Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.||Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.||Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.||Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.|
|20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness|
|5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)||Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.||Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.||Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.||Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.||Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.|
|5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)||Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.||Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.||Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.||Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.||All format elements are correct.|
|5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)||No reference page is included. No citations are used.||Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.||Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.||Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.||In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.|
|100 %Total Weightage|